Detectives Interviews

---

Austin was with him and his father and brother Sunday. He lived nearby Austin's home. Text message verifies they picked him up at 9:30 Pm. They said he walked home around 2:30 or 3pm. Verified by GPS

Hayle Roupe's girlfriend. Michaela said Hayle Roupe lived with her at the time. Jess said Austin told them he was gonna rob Brandon early Sunday morning, but Austin had never had any contact with Brandon  before that evening when he was picked up near Willow lake (verified by cell data experts).

• The recording begins with Michaela already in the room.
  We do not see her enter, who brought her in, what was said before the recording started, or whether anything happened off-camera before the recorded portion began. 
• She is alone for about the first two minutes.
  The interviewer does not visibly enter until around the 2-minute mark. For a witness who became part of the information chain about “Hatchet Man Road,” any unrecorded pre-interview interaction matters. 
• Documents/folders are visible but not readable.
  Papers are on the table, and the interviewer appears to reference or write on paperwork. The camera angle does not allow you to verify what documents were shown, what was written, or whether she reviewed anything before answering. 
• Detective Greaver testified he did not go back and listen to the earlier audio tapes.
  On cross, he acknowledged there were audio tapes and said he had not gone back to pull/listen to them after questioning about Michaela’s statements.  That matters if her earlier statement conflicted with later witness testimony. 
• Michaela did not testify, but her information was still important to the state’s narrative.
  The state’s habeas summary says Makayla/Michaela did not testify at trial, yet it also describes her as reporting information that Austin killed Brandon and later phoning in information about “Hatchet Man Road.”  That creates a confrontation/credibility concern: she was part of the investigative chain, but the jury did not hear from her directly.

• This interview happened very late.
  The visible timestamp is July 3, 2017 — weeks after Brandon disappeared, after the body was found, after Josh White’s June 15 interview, and after Austin’s June 20 arrest. That matters because Billie was used to confirm part of Josh White’s timeline, but the interview was not done immediately. 
• The file is extremely short for how important her timeline became.
  Billie/Holness was important because Josh testified that he and Brandon went to her house to swim and stayed until almost 11:00 p.m., then Brandon drove Josh back toward Akron.
  A 7-minute video is thin documentation for a witness used to confirm the victim’s whereabouts during a critical time window. 
• Phone/text evidence appears central, but the phone handling is unclear.
  Trial testimony says Billie told Greaver that Josh arrived around 9:15 p.m. because Josh texted her that he was in her driveway.  In the video, Billie appears to look down at or handle a phone/device during the interview. If her text message was being used to anchor the timeline, the phone/text should have been preserved, photographed, extracted, or clearly documented. 
• This interview confirms a timeline that conflicts with other witness narratives.
  Greaver acknowledged that the information about Brandon and Josh going to Billie Holness’s house was inconsistent with the claim that Brandon stayed at Rickey Roupe’s house with Austin using drugs. Greaver also said he followed up with Billie and learned the swimming information was true. 

• There are documents/folders on the table, but they are not readable.
  The officer appears to bring or reference paperwork very early in the interview. Because Melanie’s trial testimony involved screenshots, photos, Facebook messages, and disputed prior communications, the inability to see what documents are being used is important. 
• Her credibility/timeline was trial-critical.
  Trial records show the defense argued that Melanie and Nick were not at the apartment during the relevant window, while the state used her/Nick/Burger King timeline to argue against an alternate-suspect theory.  
• Facebook-message contradiction matters.
  Trial records indicate Facebook messages involving Melanie Engle were admitted, and the defense used communications to challenge claims that people only knew Austin as “Nate” or had just met him.